Posts Tagged ‘obama’

SHOULD OBAMA BE IN RIO?

March 21, 2011

Should the most powerful man in the world be traipsing around South America and enjoying the flesh pots of Rio de Janiero. Remember Obama is commander-in-chief, he heads the world most powerful economy, he is a world-class orator, he is president and head of state.
Remember too what is on his desk in the Oval Office.

He is running two wars against Muslim states, he has begun another war against Libya. Japan, one of great allies, is crumbling and he is nowehere to to be found when it comes to the debt crisis.

Is this anyway to run a railroad?

An official from the White House said this was a business trip. Do you know of any businessman who takes his wife, two little children and his mother-in-law on a business trip. Give me a break!

Obama is paid to lead?

Where is the leadership when he is on another continent?

Should Obama be in Rio?

What do you think?

CAN LIBYA BE HELPED?

March 18, 2011

After a delay of several weeks, the United Nations has authorized military intervention to help the rebels and unarmed civilians in Libya.  Prime Minister David Cameron says NATO planes will be in the air in a matter of hours.   Canada is sending six CF-18s – last in action in 1999 in Serbia.  Also we are sending 200 air personnel.

But is it already too late? 

Col. Gadhafi is shelling and strafing the last of the tattered rebels in Tobruk and Bhengazi.  In fact I don’t think we even know who these rebels are – are they friend or foe.

No wonder President Obama is taking a hands-off approach and taking a lot of heat for it.  Some Republicans charge he can’t make up his mind about Libya.  But he has made up his mind.  He has decided to stay out.  U.S. wars in two other Muslim states are enough.

Fox news reports that Hillary Clinton is so upset with Obama’s dithering that she is pulling her hair out and is thinking about resigning.

Meanwhile Obama and his family are jetting off to Rio for a little R&R.  Is that politically dumb?

What’s the bottom line here.  What do you wager that after the no-fly zone has come and gone. the mad Col. Gadhafi will still be in power in Tripoli?

Should Canada be sending planes and manpower?  Why?  What strategic interest do we have over there?

Should the United States stay out?

Is there any chance at this late stage that Libya can be helped?  If not it’s a fool’s errand.

Can Libya be helped?

What do you think?

SHOULD WE ABANDON THE LIBYANS?

March 12, 2011

At his press conference yesterday, President Obama made it clear the United States would not join France and Britain in a fly-zone to stop the slaughter in Libya.  France and Britain have made it clear they will not move without the United States.

Meantime, the Libyan rebels are being shelled, strafed from the air and driven into the sea. 

The fact is a huge majority of the people in Libya live within 15 kilometers of the Mediterranean coast, which makes the establishment and maintenance of a no-flyzone considerably less difficult than it was in the former Yugoslavia and Iraq.

The United States says Gadhafi should go.  Should it not do something to hasten that along?

Should we abandon the Libyans?

What do you think?

HAS OBAMA LICKED THE JOBS PROBLEM?

March 5, 2011

One of the key issues in the 2012 election will be the economy and the jobless rate.  Fortunately for Obama, his economic policies are bringing the unemployment rate steadily down.

The unemployment rate spiked at 9.6 per cent.  It then dropped to 9.4 and then to nine.  Yesterday, with the addition of 192,000 new jobs, the rate dropped to 8.9 per cent.

This is a tribute to Obama’s stimulus policies and, with further drops, it will ensure Obama will have a positive jobs story to tell in 2012.

Has Obama licked the jobs problem?

What do you think?

IS OBAMA WEAKENING TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE?

February 24, 2011

The Defense of Marriage Act, passed under Bill Clinton, emphasized the sanctity of heterosexual marriage and denied all federal benefits to same sex unions.  Conservatives were happy about this law, liberals charged that it discriminated against gays and lesbians.

Yesterday the Obama administration announced that it would no longer send federal lawyers into court to defend that Defense of Marriage Act and the discrimination agaist gays must eventually stop.

Some Conservatives charge that abandoning the Defense of Marriage Act weakens traditional marriage.

Is Obama weakening traditional marriage?

What do you think?